Tan Sri Manickavasagam’s statement in Parliament a ‘big disappointment’

Tan Sri Manickavasagam’s statement in Parliament a ‘big disappointment’

Tan Sri Manickavasagam’s statement in Parliament on the MAS 737 highjacking and mid-air explosion leading to 100 deaths is most disappointing.

He has not said very much new. And what is most important he has left unsaid. This is with regard to security arrangements in the various airports to fish out would-be hijackers. Continue reading Tan Sri Manickavasagam’s statement in Parliament a ‘big disappointment’

Essential (Security Cases) Regulations – a step towards an authoritarian police state

I move that this House repeals the Essential (Security Cases) Regulations 1975 and the Essential ( Security Cases) (Amendment) Regulations 1975.

On Oct. 4, the Government gazetted the Essential (Security Cases) Regulations 1975 under Section 2 of the Emergency (Essential Power) Ordinance No.1 of 1969.

These Regulations immediately attracted national and international censure for their blatant disregard of human fights and the overturning of basic principles of law in stripping away all the essential safeguards for a fair trial in a new breed of cases classified as “security cases”. Continue reading Essential (Security Cases) Regulations – a step towards an authoritarian police state

Detention of Datuk James Wong

I rise to move that the salary of the Home Affairs Minister be cut by $10.

The Minister of Home Affairs wields wide powers to protect the security of the nation. His function is particularly important at this stage when the country faces an upsurge of communist guerrilla activities both in the towns and jungles.

We see however gross abuse of power in the Ministry of Home Affairs which trample on the basic rights of Malaysia, and which can only erode public confidence in the democratic system and provide as inspiration to the upsurge of communist guerrilla activities.

Thus, the government claims that the communists cannot win in Malaysia because there is genuine democracy here. When the Prime Minister returned from his visit to New Zealand and Australia, he said Malaysian students who took part in protest demonstrations against him during his tour, should come back and hold public rallies instead.

But, in actual fact, public rallies have been banned since the last general elections, expect where there are by-elections.

The Minister has great powers under the Internal Security Act, and many are arrested and detained, not because they are guilty of subversion, violence, or activities that would cause racial disharmony, or danger to national security, but because they are the political opponents and critics of the powers that be.

Datuk James Wong’s detention is the most glaring instance of a patriot who was detained under the Internal Security Act, not because he had sought to subvert or overthrow the elected government by unlawful means, but on trumped-up charges to remove a political opponent to the Chief Minister if Sarawak from the active political arena.

This is a gross abuse of power, and I shall deal with this case at some length to show why I am asking for this salary cut.

Datuk James Wong’s detention: Background

Datuk James Wong was arrested by several police officers from Kuala Lumpur at his Kuching home on Oct. 30, 1974. He was informed by the p police that he was arrested pursuant to Regulation 7(1) of the Preservation of Public Security (Detention) Regulation of PPSR.

He was brought to Kuala Lumpur for detention. On December 28, 1974, a Detention Order, signed by the Federal Secretary, Sarawak, Engku Ibrahim bin Ngah, was served on him, and on January 3, 1975, Engku Ibrahim bin Ngah signed a Removal Order under the PPSR directing Datuk James Wong’s removal from Taiping Prison, Perak, to Kamunting Detention Camp, Perak.

On 10th March, the High Court in Borneo issued a writ of Habeas Corpus for the release of Datuk James Wong on the ground that his detention under the PPSR was unlawful.

Immediately after his release, he was re-arrested outside the Kuching High Court under the Internal Security Act, 1960, and flown back to Kuala Lumpur on the same day.

An order of Detention, dated 10th day of March, 1975, pursuant to Section 8 of the Internal Security Act, 1960, was served on him on the same day, together with the grounds of detention and allegations of fact.

The grounds on which the detention order was made reads:

“That you, Datuk James Wong Kim Min have since 1974, acted in a manner prejudicial to the security of Malaysia in that you have actively, knowingly and willingly collaborated and assisted a foreign power in its claim over Limbang.”

The Allegations of Fact, signed by the Deputy Home Affairs Minister, Datuk Samad Idris, in the name and on behalf of the Minister of Home Affairs, reads:

Allegations of Fact: That you, Datuk James Wong Kim Min had, during a meeting with the agent of the foreign power in May 1974, agreed to receive the aid of that foreign power to enable you to discredit (which you did) the existing Government of Sarawak and to replace it with a government formed by you and you also agreed that the government so formed by you would arrange for the secession of Limbang to that foreign power; and you further agreed with the said agent of the foreign power to receive assistance from that foreign power to accomplish the aforesaid purposes.”

On April 5, 1975, Datuk James Wong wrote to the Minister of Home Affairs from the Kamunting Detention Camp, asking for particulars of the allegations for his detention.

Datuk James Wong Wrote:

“I regret to have to inform you that the grounds and the allegation of facts supplied to me and vague, inadequate and insufficient for me to make adequate representation before the Advisory Committee before whom I would like to make objections against my detention under the Detention Order aforesaid.

“I humbly submit that to be able to make a proper and adequate representation before the Advisory Committee, I should have the following particulars:

(a) The name of the agent who allegedly met me in May 1974;

(b) The date and place of the alleged meeting.

(c) The Foreign Power concerned.

(d) The form of aid or assistance which I have allegedly agreed to receive.”

The Ministry, in a letter dated 17th April 1975, signed by Mohd. Khairi bin Haji Wan Ali b.p. Ketua Setiausaha, Kementerian Hal Ehwal Negeri, replied:

“Segala butir-butir yang dipinta, sebagaimana yang terdapat di dalam surat tuan itu, adalah butir-butir yang tuan sendiri sedia maklum.”(translation: “all particulars that you have asked for in your letters are well-known to you”

This set a very dangerous precedent for the arbitrary arrest of critics and dissenters, for all that the government need do is to put up trumped-up charges, and when asked to give the particulars of the allegations, state the accused should know about the details himself! This makes a complete mockery of the Rule of Law that a person should be informed of the charges preferred against him.

During the Advisory Board hearing of Datuk James Wong’s appeal, it was said that the “agent of the foreign powers” was Seri Begawan, Brunei, and the time of the meeting was 10 p.m. in the month of 1974, and that he had received $4 million from the Seri Begawan of Brunei. However, two crucial particulars were never supplied, namely the exact date of the alleged meeting and the place thereof.

On 6th May, at Taiping, Dato James Wong made a sworn affidavit that:

( i ) he did not receive a single cent from Seri Begawan of Brunei;

( ii ) that he did not know the Seri Begawan of Brunei personally, and that his last meeting with him was in or about 1965 when he was the Deputy Chief Minister of Sarawak and had accompanied the present Prime Minister, Tun Abdul Razak, on an official visit to the then Sultan of Brunei.

( iii ) That he had not met the Seri Begawan since 1965 and had never corresponded with him.

( iv ) That he was never in Brunei at 10 p.m. on any day in May

These statements are made by Dato James Wong on oath, and he could be charged with perjury if the Government has proof, as stated by the Deputy Minister of Home Affairs in reply to an oral question on 6.11.1975 bahawa penahanan Datuk James Wong adalah atas asas dan bokti-bokti yang cukup.

That the Government has not charged Datuk James Wong with perjury is proof that he Government cannot disprove the veracity of Dato James Wong’s affidavit, which means that the government’s allegations of fact for the detention of Datuk James Wong is merely fictional and has no relation with facts.

Dato James Wong detention is therefore not motivated by any threat that he posed to national security, but the threat he and his party, the SNAP, posed to the Sarawan Barisan Nasional.

This cannot be condoned and must be condemned as a naked arbitrary exercise of power, and it is for this reason, that I move that the salary of the responsible Minister be cut by $10.

The Minister should uphold fairness, justice and order the immediate and unconditional release of Datuk James Wong, against which the Ministry could not proffer a single evidence to back up its allegation of facts, while on the contrary, Datuk James Wong has adduced overwhelming evidence in his affidavit that he did not and could not have met the Seri Begawan of Brunei and received $4 million in agreeing to secede Limbang to Brunei.

I will only conclude with the following quotations from Dato James Wong’s affidavit:

“I do not want to see Limbang, a place where my late parents are now buried and where I was born and I had lived for many years, being taken away from Sarawak and Malaysia by any foreign power including Brunei or any persons therein.”

“I none of my speeches both in Parliament of in the Council Negri and outside these Houses, have I advocated the annexation of Limbang by any foreign power.

“I am one of those persons who supported the formation of Malaysia at its very early stages. I have done my best from 1961 to 1963 to bring Sarawak including Limbang into the Federation of Malaysia.”

For his part in help forming Malaysia, he was conferred to the Datukship and the Malaysia Commemorative Medal (Silver).

Finally, he said:

“Although I am now in detention, my views on this point have not changed an iota. I maintain, and I would fight with all my heart and strength to ensure that Limbang shall always remain part and parcel of Sarawak and of the federation of Malaysia.”

(Speech by Ketua Pembangkang and DAP M.P. for Kota Melaka, in the Dewan Rakyat on 9th Dec. 1975 on his motion to cut the Minister of Home Affairs’ salary by $10 during the 1976 Committee of Supply debate)

Reply to Rahman Ya’acob: Communist threat can only be met, not by denunciations, but by change of government policies to win and retain popular support.

Speech by Ketua Pembangkang and DAP Member of Parliament for Kota Melaka ,Lim Kit Siang, in the Dewan Rakyat during the Committee of Supply 1967 debate on the Prime Minister’s Department on Monday, 24th Nov. 1975.

Reply to Rahman Ya’acob: Communist threat can only be met, not by denunciations, but by change of government policies to win and retain popular support.

I wish first to refer to B Code 1100 (4) on National Security in the Prime Minister’s Department. Continue reading Reply to Rahman Ya’acob: Communist threat can only be met, not by denunciations, but by change of government policies to win and retain popular support.

The 1976 Budget – The Weakened Ringgit

The 1976 Budget presented by the Finance Minister last Thursday and the accompanying Treasury/ Economic Report 1975-1976 raised many big questions about the health and future of the Malaysian economy, like the weakened Ringgit, the poor economic performance of the country, mounting unemployment, continued high rate of inflation, rising public debts, the new tax proposals, and the failure to make any appreciable progress to eliminate poverty and redress economic imbalances between the haves and the have-notes.

I shall deal with these various issues. Continue reading The 1976 Budget – The Weakened Ringgit

Lim Kit Siang asking for a debate of the Essential (Security Cases) Regulation 1957 to be held before the Budget debate

The new Ketua Pembangkang, Lim Kit Siang, in his first action after his appointment, has written to the Prime Minister, Tun Razak, Asking for a debate of the Essential (Security Cases) Regulation 1957 to be held before the Budget debate which begins next week.

His letter to the Prime Minister reads:

“Tun Razak,
Prime Minister,
Malaysia.

Dear Tun Continue reading Lim Kit Siang asking for a debate of the Essential (Security Cases) Regulation 1957 to be held before the Budget debate

Call on the National Front Government to issue a White Paper on the worsening security problem in the country

Speech by DAP Secretary-General and Member of Parliament for Bandar Melaka, Mr. Lim Kit Siang, at a DAP Public Rally at Sungei Way on Sunday, 3rd March 1974 at 8 p.m.

1. Call on the National Front Government to issue a White Paper on the worsening security problem in the country

While on the one hand, we keep reading statements and speeches by Alliance Ministers that the security situation is firmly under control, we also continue to read of reports about the growing security problem, which has extended in scope and geography. Continue reading Call on the National Front Government to issue a White Paper on the worsening security problem in the country

The plight of fishermen and padi farmers in Malaysia

Speech by Lim kit Siang in the Dewan Rakyat on the 1974 Estimates for the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries on December 21, 1973

Call on the Malaysian government to have urgent discussions with Indonesian authorities to demarcate the international waters in the Straits of Malacca and to make arrangements to enable Malacca and other Malaysian fishermen to pursue their livelihood in the spirit of ASEAN fraternity and solidarity

Since August this year, the 600 Malacca fishermen of all races have faced great hardships, without governmental assistance or concern.

In August this year, 22 Malacca fishing boats in the high seas in the Straits of Malacca were captured by some Indonesian authorities, and held to ransom.

To secure the release of a boat, the relatives of the detained fishermen were required to pay a ransom of $3,000 per boat.

In the past, the ransom money per boat had only been a few hundred dollars. Then it began to rise, and recently, in keeping with world-wide inflation, it is shot up from $1,000 to $3,000. This means that over $60,000 were paid to secure the release of the 22 Malaysian fishing boats and about 50 men. Continue reading The plight of fishermen and padi farmers in Malaysia

Lim Kit Siang warns against using of emergency powers to control rice situation

Ketua Pembangkang and DAP Secretary-General, Mr. Lim Kit Siang, today issued the following statement (9.10.1973):

Lim Kit Siang warns against using of emergency powers to control rice situation

The Deputy Prime Minister, Dato Hussein Onn, said yesterday that the government will muster all resources and, if necessary, use its emergency powers to impose heavier penalties on rice smugglers, hoarders and profiteers.

The Opposition is opposed to the use of emergency powers in normal times, for it will lead to considerable abuse of powers.

If the government feels that the penalties for rice smugglers, hoarders and profiteers are inadequate, the government should convene an emergency session of Parliament to increase these penalties.

An emergency session of Parliament can be called in a matter of three or four days, as was done when the Parliament was convened in emergency session within a matter of days in 1967 to change the constitution to topple Dato Stephen Kalong Ningkan as Chief Minister of Sarawak. Continue reading Lim Kit Siang warns against using of emergency powers to control rice situation

Demarcate international waters in the Straits of Malacca to enable Malaysian fishermen to pursue their livelihood in the spirit of ASEAN fraternity and solidarity

Statement by DAP Secretary-General and Member of Parliament for Bandar Melaka, Mr. Lim Kit Siang, at a press conference at 33A Jalan Munshi Abdullah, Malacca on Wednesday, 19th Sept. 1973 at 10.45 a.m.

Lim Kit Siang calls on the Ministry of Fisheries and Foreign Ministry to have urgent discussion with Indonesian authorities to demarcate the international waters in the Straits of Malacca and to make arrangements to enable Malacca and other Malaysian fishermen to pursue their livelihood in the spirit of ASEAN fraternity and solidarity

I have called this press conference to bring to the attention of the government and public the plight, suffering and hardship of the 600 Malacca fishermen of all races who for the past one month had not dared to go out to fish in international waters in the Straits of Malacca.

This followed the disappearance of 22 Malacca fishing boats in the high sea a month ago. It was subsequently reported in the press that the five boats had returned after paying ransom money of $3000 each. There are still 17 boats in detention, and which have not returned.

In the past, the ransom money per boat had been only a few hundred dollars. Then it began to rise, and recently it was in the region of $1000. Now, it is $3000. Continue reading Demarcate international waters in the Straits of Malacca to enable Malaysian fishermen to pursue their livelihood in the spirit of ASEAN fraternity and solidarity